FEEDBACK THAT AFFECTS FIRST YEAR MEDICAL STUDENT’S LEARNING IN HIGH POWER DISTANCE & COLLECTIVISM CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21460/bikdw.v4i2.149Keywords:
Feedback, Clinical Skills, High Powter Distance Low Individualism, Collectivism, Early YearAbstract
References
Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:a1961.
Norcini J. The power of feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):16-17.
Dent JA, Harden RM. A practical guide for medical teachers. London; New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2013.
Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777-781.
van de Ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OT. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42(2):189-197.
Gordon J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: one to one teaching and feedback. BMJ. 2003;326(7388):543-545.
Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):117-128.
Nicholson S, Cook V, Naish J, Boursicot K. Feedback: its importance in developing medical students’ clinical practice. The Clinical Teacher. 2008;5(3):163-166.
Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101-108.
Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):787-791.
Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):111-116.
Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119(2):254-284.
Hattie J, Timperley H. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):81-112.
Suhoyo Y, Van Hell EA, Kerdijk W, et al. Influence of feedback characteristics on perceived learning value of feedback in clerkships: does culture matter? BMC Medical Education. 2017;17(1):69.
Baron RA. Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. J Appl Psychol. 1988;73(2):199-207.
Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(1):15-26.
Tekian A, Watling CJ, Roberts TE, Steinert Y, Norcini J. Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1245-1249.
Suhoyo Y, van Hell EA, Prihatiningsih TS, Kuks JB, Cohen-Schotanus J. Exploring cultural differences in feedback processes and perceived instructiveness during clerkships: replicating a Dutch study in Indonesia. Med Teach. 2014;36(3):223-229.
Hofstede G. Culture's consequences : comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage; 2013.
Swanwick T, Association for the Study of Medical E. Understanding medical education : evidence, theory, and practice. 2014.
Al-Kadri HM, Al-Moamary MS, Roberts C, Van der Vleuten CP. Exploring assessment factors contributing to students' study strategies: literature review. Med Teach. 2012;34 Suppl 1:S42-50.
Pratt DD, Kelly M, Wong WSS. Chinese conceptions of 'effective teaching' in Hong Kong: towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 1999;18(4):241-258.
Wong AK. Culture in medical education: comparing a Thai and a Canadian residency programme. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1209-1219.
Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 1991;98(2):224-253.
Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):625-631.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish in Berkala Ilmiah Kedokteran Duta Wacana agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0